Amazon margins and online sales tax

Amazon reported Q4 earnings on Tuesday.  Q4 revenues soared to $21 billion, up 22% Y-o-Y.  Net income was a dramatically different story at $97 million.  Looking at the net margin, it comes out to about 0.5%.  It reminds you of the imaginary quote “Don’t worry about the profits, we will make it up on volume.”

What’s up with the margin? Is it okay to only earn 1/2 of a penny on each dollar?  Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos was on a recent Harvard Business Review podcast and was asked that exact question. His response was pretty sensible,

“Percentage margins are not one of the things we are seeking to optimize. It’s the absolute dollar-free cash flow per share that you want to maximize, and if you can do that by lowering margins, we would do that. So if you could take the free cash flow, that’s something that investors can spend. Investors can’t spend percentage margins.”

Amazon - Sales Tax - BezosBezos is no fool.  He is an ex-hedge fund manager, and Fortune Magazine’s 2012 Businessperson of the year.  He holds a long-term strategy and has consistently made bold, strategic, and industry-altering moves.  He has also done well for investors.  Apparently, Bezos has delivered about 12,000% shareholder return while CEO.

Analysts like the stock.  As of today’s close, AMZN was $272.  On Finviz, you can see that most analysts reiterated their ratings with a target price between $260-$335.

What about sales tax?   My primary questions is about sales tax.  If you compared Amazon’s net margin % with the average sales tax % (that is not getting collected by Amazon, or the Government) it’s not a pretty picture.  If customers had sales tax added to purchases, would they buy so much stuff online?  If AMZN had to hypothetically pay state taxes (after operating or net income), they would be unprofitable.

AMZN vs sales tax

States want their taxes.  Apparently 45 states have sales or use tax that should apply to online purchases.  Either the retailer should collect the sales tax (which most don’t) or the buyer should voluntarily pay the tax on their tax form here.  The majority of online retailers don’t collect sales taxes with the order because they do not have a physical presence (nexus) in the state of the buyer.  Here is a good explanation of sales tax on the internet.

I was curious, so I dug up a state tax form.  This one is from Virginia (pdf) and it looks like they really do want the tax money from the online purchases. Un-fun.

The use tax applies to the use, consumption or storage of tangible personal property in Virginia when the Virginia sales or use tax was not paid at the time of purchase.

Amazon know this.  They have a section of their website that gives instructions to customers and tries to clarify the mystery surrounding taxes for online purchases.

Just as often, they lobby against the require to collect sales tax at the time of purchase.  Naturally, they would like to leave it to the consumer (who may, or may not do it).   Amazon went back and forth with the California legislature, but lost.  Amazon started collecting taxes on purchases made from California in September of 2012.  Unsurprisingly, people started to stock up on things from Amazon before the tax-collection started.

The looming deadline prompted San Diego artist John Purlia to finally buy that Samsung flat-screen television that had been sitting in his Amazon shopping cart for months

Inevitably, more sales tax will be collected online.  States and local municipalities are dirt poor.  Tax revenues is shrinking.  Some of their bonds are junk status.  States want that revenue and they will argue (rightly) that this levels the playing field for local retailers.

I am no fan of taxes, but the law already exists.  From the state’s point of view Amazon will do a better job of collecting sales taxes than relying on 1) millions of people in the US 2) filing their taxes 3) keep track of their purchases 4) and doing it appropriately.

It’s a headwind for Amazon and other retailers.  If Amazon has to collect that tax from all of its millions of consumers, sales will go down.  That said, I am avid shopper on Amazon and will continue to use their website, reviews and free 2 day shipping with Prime.  Even though I don’t believe the 0.5% net income is a sustainable business model, I will not be betting against Bezos or the stock.  I will not be writing naked calls.

Related Articles / Resources:

Olympic trivia: live pigeon shooting, youngest athlete, theoretical limit to running, 100+ year gold medal count

In the spirit of the Olympics, four graphs courtesy of the Economist blog.

1.The types of Olympic games have changed over the years.  The Olympics had 26 events in London, but that has not always been the case.  As recently as Beijing 2008, there were 28 events.  Well what are some of the events that went away?

  • Rope climbing seems like a simple and difficult sport.  Climbing a 20 or 25 foot rope with just your hands.  It appeared sporadically 4 times over 40 years
  • Live pigeon shooting in the 1900 Paris Olympics.  History.com notes that this went away after some spectators were horrified by the gore and cried
  • Tug-of-war existing between 1900 and 1920.  8 men on each side

Discontinued Olympic Sports

2. Olympians vary in age from 10 to 70 years old.  Seems like shooting and equestrian are good choices for the geriatric.  The younger athletes do better in swimming and gymnastics.  I guess we shouldn’t let 13 year-olds play with guns anyway.Oldest Olympic Athletes3. Olympians keep getting faster.  Dr. Mark Denny, from Stanford, has calculated the theoretical limit to how fast men and women can run (for the geeks: looking at the maximum standard deviation from the mean), and Olympians are rapidly approaching that limit.  That probably means that fewer records will be broken in the future.  Usain Bolt is crazy fast.

Fast Olympic Runner4. The US has done well at sports for 100 years.  In a different post, I showed that there are many ways to measure Olympic medals (e.g., medals per population, medals per GDP, medals per athlete).   That said, the most popular metric is the total number of gold medals.  Below, you can see who won the most gold by event over the last 100+ years

  • The US won the majority of golds in track/field (35%), diving (46%), swimming (50%)
  •  The Soviet Union won the majority of the golds in gymnastics (21%) and weight lifting (21%), and wrestling (16%).  Can you imagine if they kept winning after 1989?
  • Overall, the US has won 22% of the golds across all sports

Most Winning Country

Olympic Medals Measured by Population, By Productivity, By GDP

As a consultant, it always seemed odd that news reporters routinely compare the medal count between the USA and China – after all, the USA has 530 athletes compared to China’s 380.  Seems like the total number of medals is only one of many potential metrics.  For example, productivity (i.e., # of athletes needed to win a medal) would be a metric that levels the playing field among countries of different sizes.  Thinking along those lines, I smashed together data of the last 40 years and came up with this:

If you’re from Iceland, there is a good chance you are an Olympic Athlete. . .

Most selective Olympic team

In 2010, there were 319K people in Iceland and yet they sent 27 people to London for the Olympics.  Simple math tells us that they sent 1 athlete for every 11K people.  In fact, it is really easy to be an Icelandic Olympic athlete compared to the Bangladeshi.

I took the country’s 2010 population here and divided it by the number of athletes that each country sent to the London Olympics.   You can see that China sent 1 athlete to the Olympics for every 3.5M citizens.  The US sends 1 athlete for every 580K citizens.  It is easier to go to the Olympics as an American than a Chinese – less selective.

Olympics by Population 1972-2008If you are from Bangladesh, your chances of going to the Olympics as an athlete are slim.  Only 1 in 30 million Bangladeshi go to compete in the Olympics.  As a thought-experiment, if all the teams sent 1 athlete for every 30M people . . .

  • The US Olympic team would only send 10 people (not 580)
  • The total Olympics would only be 233 Athletes (not the 10,700+ it currently is)
  • Only 40 countries (over 30M population) would be competing

The most productive Olympic athletes are from . . . . Panama

Athlete productivity

Why does data surprise us?  Looking at all the medals won in 2008, and then dividing it by the number of athletes sent to Beijing by country, Panama wins the prize for the most productive athletes.   Panama will win 1 medal (over average) for every 3 athletes they send to the Olympics.  It is correlation, not causality – but it is still impressive.

Olympics Medals

  • South Africa won 1 medal in 2008 with 136 athletes
  • Burkina Faso also won 1 medal in 2008, with only 6 athletes

Of all the medals that China wins, more than 50% are gold

Gold as a percentage of medals

In a previous post, I discovered that only 32% of medals are gold (more than 36% are bronze).  When analyzing the medals over the last 40 years, the Chinese have stood out as a strong bunch.  51% of their medals are gold vs. 32% of US medals being gold.

Olympic Gold %

In terms of the GDP per athlete, the Indonesia was the highest

GDP per Athlete flag

Looking at the country-based GDP numbers here, Indonesia has $32B in GDP (2010) for every athlete sent to London 2012.  By comparison, every Tuvalu athlete symbolizes only $10M in GDP output.  Likewise, the US Olympic athlete symbolizes $27B in output compared to $4B represented by the British athlete.

GDP per Athlete

China keeps winning. . .

Looking at the current medal leaders in London, you can see that the United States (in white) has been consistently winning ~ 100 medals every summer Olympics except in the 1980 Olympics where there was a boycott.   The British  (in blue) have done well since 2000, but the Chinese are the stand outs.  They had no Olympic team in 1980, yet they had 100 medals in 2008.

Summer Olympic Medals US China UK

I am a patriotic American.  Huge believer in US constitution, freedom of speech, Chik-Fil-A sandwiches, our top-shelf graduate education system, Pixar movies, micro-brews, Teddy Roosevelt, National parks and NPR.  (Yes, I do wish the Economist was a US paper).  Love watching the women’s soccer (not football) team beat the Japanese, and the women’s volleyball finals US vs. US.  Michael Phelps is impressive too.

That said, we also need to give credit where credit is due.  The Chinese have been rocking the Olympics.  A balanced scored card of the Olympics might look like this.

Scorecard US China UK

China won 100 medals in 2008 summer Olympics which was a 59% increase over 2004.  Each Chinese athlete has a 1 in 3.5 million chance of making the team, but when they get to the Olympics ~ it takes 6.4 athletes to win a medal, and 51% of the time it is gold.

The Olympics are awesome to watch and one of the most democratic sporting events, if you are willing to measure medal counts a little bit differently.  Enjoy the games.  Go USA.

Note: The Huffington Post has also done an excellent job with this line of thinking – alternate ways to count medals.  Look here.