Wrote the original blog post in 2018. It’s 2023, and three things: a) SuperCell still abides by this management philosophy and finding great smart people, keep teams tight, celebrating failures (because it’s a sign of innovation), willingness to say “no” to mediocre products, and winning b) they now have 400 employees and 5 games c) now I am at Level 41, heh heh.
SuperCell
Amazing story of a Finnish start-up that makes mobile games. They made Clash of Clans, the highest grossing app on IOS and Android app stores. Boom. Started in 2010, and sold 84% of the company to Tencent in 2016 for $8.6 Billion. I know this sounds crazy, but it’s not. The level of player engagement is crazy (trust me, I have spent (read: wasted) dozens of hours on the game. They make great money. In 2016, it had revenues of 2.1 Billion Euros, and net profits of 917 Million Euros. A 44% operating margin. So Tencent is paying about 11x EBITDA (yes rich), but Activision / Blizzard bought KING (Candy Crush) sold for $5.9B+.
Hay Day, Boom Beach, Clash of Clans, Clash Royale.
You’ve played one of these games before, admit it.
Fascinating founder story
Read their story here.
On the SuperCell website they tell a compelling story. It’s 3,000+ words long. They know who they are. They are different. They have a strategy. They know what not-to-do.
1. Hire the best people
This is a generic adage. All companies purport to do this. However, SuperCell marries that idea with a more radical notion that management should do less (Sounds like Peter Drucker). Low overhead; in fact, as of Jan 2018, there are only 244 employees.
The sole mission of the founders and management would be to acquire the best talent FOR EVERY SINGLE POSITION, create the best possible environment for them, and then get out of the way. It would be an environment with zero bureaucracy. -SuperCell
We fundamentally believe in the power of “small”. Being small means you need less management and fewer processes, both of which just make it more fun to work. As such, our explicit goal is to keep the company as small as possible – SuperCell
2. Organize into cells
These small teams, called “cells”, have autonomy to fast-collaborate and create prototypes and test them. This reminds me deeply of Founder’s Mentality, and I love this.
We’ve found that the best quality work comes from small teams in which every single member is passionate about what they do. Often times when teams become bigger, processes, bureaucracy and even politics emerge, and the work just isn’t fun anymore. . . Each game comes from a cell, and they all operate extremely independently and have complete control over their own roadmap. Our organizational model is optimized for speed and passion, not for control. – SuperCell
3. Focus
They only have 4 products (games) that generate $2 Billion+ in revenue because. . . of #4
4. Kill products
A big part of their story is the graveyard of games that were created, but shuttered. If you watch the video below, you see they take an upbeat pride in all the products they did not waste your time with. This takes guts. After all, it’s just human nature to overlook sunk costs. After developing a game night/day for 6 months, do you think a developer cell wants to abandon their baby? Hell no. But that’s what they do. Winning.
5. Celebrate innovation (not just success)
This picture is emblematic of why they have a winning culture. Toasting champagne every time they make the difficult decision of sunsetting (read: killing) at product.
When you read their story, you see that it is a series of fail-fail-fail-fail-win-fail-fail-win-fail-fail,win.They are repeatedly pouring their hearts into products, and quickly cutting their losses. This should incredible judgment and heart. Judgment = how do you know what’s a winner? Heart = just let your baby float down the river?
We’d like to think that every failure is a unique opportunity to learn, and every lesson will ultimately make us better at what we do. That’s why we have a tradition of celebrating these lessons by drinking champagne every time we screw up. For us, it’s clear that releasing hit games means having to take risks. And by definition, taking risks means that you’ll fail more often than you’ll succeed. So whenever we realize that we haven’t failed in a while, it’s a sign that we haven’t taken enough risks. And that is truly the biggest possible risk for a creative company like ours.
Great case study of how small, passionate, focused teams can do crushingly good work. Also, that Jim Collins did have right. Get the right people on the bus. Okay – Gotta get back to my Clash Royale game. Almost at level 8.
Great summary of the factors that made the difference for Supercell.
Reminds me of the culture and success of Basecamp (minus the outsized exit).
I’ve found that one of the biggest challenges for visionary founders is the willingness to kill projects AND focus on making the winners stronger and more stable.
The need for variety and stimulation through novelty is a saboteur of many would-be successes.
So true.
I have one word for your explanation “BRILLIANT”…
Thanks for reading. After playing HOURS of Clash Royale, I wanted to know more about the company, then I soon found out that . . they are brilliant.
Also reminds me of the best projects I did while in consulting. High performing teams can get a tremendous amount of work done. I recently transitioned to a VC-funded start-up and founders have yet to deploy the principles in this article. Instead we have a huge chaos and everyone trying to individually create their own little empire.
Yes, that is all too common. Do great work, give, and make others successful. If that’s not rewarded eventually, then maybe not the right place. Stay strong, have a powerful 2018.